VeriDue AI Insight
TRUTH, BEFORE YOU INVEST

AI analyzes startup narrative, code, and revenue to detect hidden risks — so you invest with confidence.

Start Analysis

Core Intelligence Layers

What Veridue Does

Veridue doesn’t just analyze startups — it surfaces the gaps between what founders say and what the underlying data actually reveals.

01

Narrative Analysis

Detects inconsistencies between founder claims and real operating performance.

02

Code Intelligence

Scans architecture, identifies technical debt, and flags scalability risk.

03

Revenue Truth

Uncovers ghost churn, fake growth signals, and unstable revenue patterns.

04

Risk Detection

Aggregates all signals into a clear, investor-friendly integrity view.

Workflow

How It Works

From startup story to investor-ready intelligence in one clean workflow.

STEP 01

Add Startup Context

Input startup narrative, market story, and company profile.

STEP 02

Connect Data

Link GitHub repositories, revenue files, or other diligence sources.

STEP 03

AI Deep Analysis

Veridue scans technical, narrative, and financial signals together.

STEP 04

Investor Verdict

Get risk breakdowns, critical questions, and a final recommendation.

Agent Intelligence

Live AI Analysis

Watch Veridue work through startup systems like an autonomous diligence copilot.

VeriDue Terminal

Results

AI Insights

A quick investor view of startup integrity across core dimensions.

72
Startup Health
81
Technical Score
58
Revenue Score

Risk Categories

High Risk
3
Medium Risk
5
Low Risk
8

Consistency Check

Narrative vs Reality

What founders say versus what the data actually supports.

"We have 10x MoM growth"

Revenue grew 2.3x in the last 6 months with a declining trajectory.

Discrepancy Detected

"Our tech stack is production-ready"

Strong test coverage and CI/CD signals, though some scaling risks remain.

Mostly Verified

"We are market leader in our segment"

Only 3rd by revenue, with 2 competitors growing faster.

Needs Validation

"Retention is excellent"

Inactive paying users suggest hidden churn and weaker retention than claimed.

Contradicted

Diligence Questions

Key Investor Questions

Critical questions generated from the analysis to guide the next conversation.

What explains the revenue plateau in Q3 despite claimed growth?

Why are 40% of GitHub commits from a single contributor?

Can the team demonstrate CAC payback under 18 months?

What is the retention rate beyond the first 90 days?

How does the burn rate align with the stated runway?

Final Recommendation

Proceed with Caution

While the technical foundation appears solid, revenue claims show meaningful discrepancies. Further diligence on retention, churn, and dependency concentration is recommended.

Proceed
Caution
Avoid

Ready to analyze your next investment?

Turn startup stories, code, and revenue into investor-grade intelligence.

Start Analysis